【罌粟摘要】咪達唑侖與地塞米松聯合昂丹司瓊預防腹腔鏡手術後噁心嘔吐的比較

咪達唑侖與地塞米松聯合昂丹司瓊預防腹腔鏡手術後噁心嘔吐的比較

【罌粟摘要】咪達唑侖與地塞米松聯合昂丹司瓊預防腹腔鏡手術後噁心嘔吐的比較

貴州醫科大學 麻醉與心臟電生理課題組

翻譯:馬豔燕 編輯:張中偉 審校:曹瑩

背景

咪達唑侖與安慰劑相比或作為其他止吐藥物的輔助藥時,可減少術後噁心嘔吐(PONV)。本研究旨在比較咪達唑侖與地塞米松聯合昂丹司瓊預防PONV的效果。

方法

120名接受腹腔鏡手術並有兩個或兩個以上發生PONV危險因素(簡化Apfel評分)的患者被隨機分成兩組,每組60人。D組患者給予地塞米松8 mg和昂丹司瓊4 mg預防PONV, M組患者在手術結束時給予咪達唑侖2 mg。在術後24小時內,分別在0- 2小時、2- 24小時和0- 24小時內記錄PONV、術後噁心(PON)和術後嘔吐(POV)患者的比例(頻率)。

結果

術後24 h PONV的發生率D組為30%,M組為33。3%,差異無統計學意義(P = 0。7 )。兩組患者麻醉後出院評分≥9分的時間無差異{ D組5 min (5,5);M組5 min(1。25,5),P =0 。48}。D組有10例患者,M組有11例患者需要超過24小時的搶救止吐藥物(P=0。81)。在所有時間段內PON,POV和PONV的發生率以及PONV評分的中位數相似。

【罌粟摘要】咪達唑侖與地塞米松聯合昂丹司瓊預防腹腔鏡手術後噁心嘔吐的比較

【罌粟摘要】咪達唑侖與地塞米松聯合昂丹司瓊預防腹腔鏡手術後噁心嘔吐的比較

結論

與地塞米松聯合昂丹司瓊相比,咪達唑侖不會導致PONV發生率顯著不同。

原始文獻來源

Prakash K,Meshram T,Jain P。 Midazolam versus dexamethasone- ondansetron in preventing post- operative nausea- vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries。 Acta Anaesthesiol Scand。 2021;00:1– 7。

【罌粟摘要】咪達唑侖與地塞米松聯合昂丹司瓊預防腹腔鏡手術後噁心嘔吐的比較

Midazolam versus dexamethasone-ondansetron in preventing

post-operative nausea-vomiting in patients undergoing

laparoscopic surgeries

Abstract

Background:Midazolam reduces post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) whencompared to a placebo or when used as an adjuvant to other antiemetics。 The present study was designed to compare midazolam with a combination of dexamethasone ondansetron in preventing PONV。

Methods:One hundred and twenty patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries having 2 or more risk factors for PONV (simplified Apfel score) were randomised into 2 groups of 60 each。 Patients in group D received 8-mg dexamethasone and 4-mg ondansetron for PONV prophylaxis while those in group M received 2-mg midazolam towards the end of surgery。 The proportion of patients (frequency) who had PONV, post-operative nausea (PON) and post-operative vomiting (POV) was noted over 24 hours over the following intervals: 0-2 hours, 2-24 hours and 0-24 hours。

Results:The frequency of PONV at 24 hours in group D and group M was 30% and 33。3% respectively and was not significantly different (P = 。70)。 There was no difference in the time to achieve post-anaesthesia discharge score of ≥9 between the two groups {5 minutes (5, 5) in group D; 5 minutes (1。25, 5) in group M, P = 。48}。 Ten patients in group D and 11 in group M required a rescue antiemetic over 24 hours (P = 。81)。 The frequency of PON, POV and PONV as well as the median PONV score was similar at all time periods。

Conclusion:Midazolam does not result in significantly different frequency of PONV than a combination of dexamethasone-ondansetron。

感謝點贊支援!